A model is injured on set — and the agency gets named in the claim.
WC in the model's own name keeps the injury a comp claim, not a lawsuit against the agency.
WC and GL issued in the talent's name, not the agency's — the same protection without the misclassification exposure. New York's Fashion Workers Act already made this the standard, and other states are moving the same way.
The Fashion Workers Act raised the floor. Five places the old agency playbook now sits below it.
WC in the model's own name keeps the injury a comp claim, not a lawsuit against the agency.
Per-booking coverage in the model's name closes the gap — no payroll conversion.
It holds them to new licensing and fiduciary duties. Models stay independent contractors — and coverage in their own name protects them without a W-2 conversion.
Issued in the model's name, client and agency added — no certificate chase the morning of the shoot.
Handling compliance well becomes a reason talent signs with you.
What runs from deal memo to call time — real coverage for your talent, without converting models to W-2.
The Assignments API takes the booking as input, returns a per-booking rate, and binds when the model opts in. Coverage issues in the contractor's name, agency named as additional insured — structured the way a booking actually runs.
Booking fees go in, premium comes out — line by line, per model, per state. The audit trail your accountants and clients ask for is already structured the way they need to read it.
WC and GL issue in the model's name; the agency and client get listed as additional insureds per booking. The structure that keeps talent independent and the agency protected — without a W-2 conversion.
Each booking confirms what matters for coverage: insured in the model's name, the agency named, the COI current, and the window matched to the dates. The documentation builds itself as you go.
I used to 1099 all our talent, but the payroll services kept pushing everyone to W-2 and charging all these fees — and we couldn't even track the money. Per-gig coverage in the talent's name is what lets us stay 1099 without the trauma.
Per-booking WC and GL mechanics, agency additional-insured options, and how coverage fits while your models stay independent contractors.
Increasingly, yes. State labor regulators in CA, NY, NJ, and MA require WC coverage for any worker performing labor on an engagement — even when classified as 1099. The NY Fashion Workers Act (Q3 2026) makes this explicit for stylists, photographers, makeup artists, and production crews. Without WC in the creator's name, the brand engaging them becomes the de facto employer for liability purposes.
Not when the policy is in the contractor's name. 1099Policy issues coverage to the creator as the named insured — the brand or agency is added as a blanket additional insured. That's the legal opposite of an EOR arrangement, where the employer-of-record assumes the W-2 relationship. Courts, the IRS, and state regulators treat "coverage in the contractor's name" as a key indicia of independence.
The creator's policy responds first. WC covers medical, lost-wage indemnity, and rehab — paid directly to the creator at no cost to them. The brand's separate GL and additional-insured status protect against secondary liability. Without coverage in the contractor's name, the brand typically becomes responsible for medical bills and faces misclassification audit risk.
Yes. Per-gig, per-day, and annual options are all available. A creator who opts in once is automatically covered for every engagement that flows through 1099Policy — across multiple brands and agencies — using the same underlying policy. The blanket additional-insured structure lets each new brand engagement attach without re-underwriting.
Effective Q3 2026, any agency engaging models, stylists, makeup artists, photographers, or production crew must document workers' comp coverage at the start of each engagement. Coverage must be active during the engagement and verifiable on demand. 1099Policy's API delivers compliant COIs in seconds and stores audit-ready records by default.
The creator — always. Their name is on the COI, the carrier holds the policy in their entity, and claims pay out to them. The brand or agency is added as additional insured so they're protected against third-party claims arising from the engagement. The underlying policy never makes the brand the employer-of-record, which is what preserves 1099 status.
WC and GL issued in the talent's name, available before call time. The lightest credible audit trail in the industry.
